Filter and export

Publications

What is a Publication?
3 Publications visible to you, out of a total of 3
Peptide epitopes as biomarkers of soya sensitization in rBet v 1 immunotherapy of birch-related soya allergy.

Abstract (Expand)

BACKGROUND: There are no diagnostic and/or prognostic markers of the treatment outcome in patients receiving allergen immunotherapy (AIT). Although numerous allergen epitopes are known, their value in … this context has not been investigated. This paper deals with re-evaluation of sera from patients who underwent AIT against rBet v 1 for treatment of their soya allergy (BASALIT trial). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic and/or prognostic potential of allergen epitopes recognition by antibodies from patients with birch-related soya allergy before and after rBet v 1-immunotherapy. METHODS: PR-10 epitope-binding profiles from 34 patients were identified in silico using a statistical peptide phage display at start and at end of AIT. IgE- and IgG-binding to these peptide epitopes was measured in peptide microarrays. Clinical relevance of epitopes was evaluated by comparing these measurements to a number of treatment outcome measures recorded during double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge at start and end of AIT. RESULTS: We showed that IgG- and IgE-recognition of peptide epitopes after AIT were surrogate markers of 5 out of 12 analysed treatment outcome measures using this patient cohort. Seven epitopes were identified from multiple PR-10 allergen sequences. Twenty-six peptide epitopes were used for IgG and IgE measurements. IgE-binding to one of the epitopes was associated with stronger intensity of oral tingling/itching after ingesting soya at start of AIT. IgG recognizing two other epitopes at start of AIT could predict decreased Cor a 1-specific IgE concentration (p = .043) and decreased lip swelling intensity (p = .016) after AIT. Tolerance to increasing amounts of soy at food challenge correlated with IgG-binding to another epitope at start of AIT (p = .046). CONCLUSION: IgG- and IgE-binding to peptide epitopes in PR-10 is a potential indicator of the outcome and clinical course of AIT of soya-sensitized patients with rBet v 1.

Authors: L. R. Caballero, R. Treudler, N. Delaroque, J. C. Simon, K. Kern, M. Szardenings

Date Published: 15th Sep 2022

Publication Type: Journal

BASALIT trial: double-blind placebo-controlled allergen immunotherapy with rBet v 1-FV in birch-related soya allergy.

Abstract (Expand)

BACKGROUND: Conflicting results exist on the effect of allergen immunotherapy (AIT) on pollen-related food allergy. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of one-year AIT with the folding variant (FV) … of recombinant (r) Bet v 1 on birch-related soya allergy. METHODS: Of 138 subjects with Bet v 1 sensitization, 82 were positive at double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) with soya. A total of 56 of 82 were randomized in the ratio of 2:1 (active: placebo). Per-protocol population (PPP) had received >/=150 mug of allergen or placebo preparation. OUTCOME MEASURES: lowest observed adverse effect levels (LOAEL), postinterventional occurrence of objective signs (objS) at any dose level, sIgE/IgG4 against Bet v 1 and Gly m 4. Between-group changes were investigated (ancova, Mann-Whitney U-test, Fisher exact test). RESULTS: Baseline characteristics including LOAELs were comparable in both groups with objS and subjS occurring in 82% and 95% of active (n = 38) vs 78% and 83% of placebo group (n = 18). After AIT, objS occurred in 24% and 47%, respectively. LOAEL group differences showed a beneficial tendency (P = 0.081) for LOAEL(objective) in PPP (30 active, 15 placebo). sIgG4 raised only in active group (Bet v 1: P = 0.054, Gly m 4: P = 0.037), and no relevant changes occurred for sIgE. Only 56% of the intended sample size was recruited. CONCLUSION: For the first time, we present data on the effect of rBet v 1-FV on birch-related soya allergy. rBet v 1-FV AIT induced significant immunogenic effects. Clinical assessment showed a tendency in favour of the active group but did not reach statistical significance.

Authors: R. Treudler, A. Franke, A. Schmiedeknecht, B. Ballmer-Weber, M. Worm, T. Werfel, U. Jappe, T. Biedermann, J. Schmitt, R. Brehler, A. Kleinheinz, J. Kleine-Tebbe, H. Bruning, F. Rueff, J. Ring, J. Saloga, K. Schakel, T. Holzhauser, S. Vieths, J. C. Simon

Date Published: 21st Dec 2016

Publication Type: Journal

The BASALIT multicenter trial: Gly m 4 quantification for consistency control of challenge meal batches and toward Gly m 4 threshold data.

Abstract (Expand)

SCOPE: The BASALIT clinical trial (EudraCT 2009-011737-27) investigated efficacy of birch allergen immunotherapy on lowest observed adverse effect levels after soy food challenge in patients with … birch-associated and Gly m 4 allergen mediated soy allergy. Thus, consistently stable Gly m 4 levels were required in standardized challenge meals. METHODS AND RESULTS: Soy meal included soy protein isolate (SPI, 88% total protein). A Gly m 4 specific ELISA was developed and validated. Six SPIs and 24 meal batches were analyzed for Gly m 4. (Repeated-measures) analyses of variance were done to identify potential changes between batches and time intervals. Gly m 4 was below the ELISA detection limit (2 ng/mL) in placebo batches. With <20% mean coefficient of variation, Gly m 4 levels were consistent in 24 soy meal batches and within individual 12-wk shelf-life. CONCLUSION: The novel Gly m 4 specific ELISA proved consistency of challenge meal batches over a 56-month study period. With an average of 178 mug/g Gly m 4 in SPI, Gly m 4 lowest observed adverse effect level can be calculated once clinical lowest observed adverse effect level data based on SPI are available. Hence, sensitivity of patients can be correlated to the relevant allergen content instead of total protein of the allergenic source.

Authors: T. Holzhauser, A. Franke, R. Treudler, A. Schmiedeknecht, S. Randow, W. M. Becker, J. Lidholm, S. Vieths, J. C. Simon

Date Published: 18th Oct 2016

Publication Type: Journal

Powered by
 (v.1.15.2)
About NFDI4Health | Partners and Funding | Credits
Copyright © 2008 - 2023 The University of Manchester and HITS gGmbH